Spiritual Healing Spiritual or neglect

Spiritual Healing Spiritual or neglect Christians with chronic illness need to know is a source for healing beyond secular medicine that does not follow the patte or knowledge of this world. This source is spiritual and comes from God! But there is a problem. Millions of Christians stole the gift of spiritual healing through Christian spiritual traditions malpractice.Numerous (doctrines) that the time of miraculous healing, spiritual healing, or whatever the name is known, has completed. These traditions had time to divine healing, anointing with oil and hands, which ended when the last apostle died. With this type of education, there is no doubt that much confusion, illness and suffering.Those to make the claim that God does not intervene in this world through spiritual healing need to ask a question. Since he made such statement is bo, God or Satan? If God, then his will be done. But if this is not the teaching of God? I assume that Satan is whispering in your ear of him that God has completed the spiritual healing. So what? What is the consequence of believing and teaching this doctrine? This doctrine of the Church leaders and announce that he was responsible for denying millions of chronically ill Christians the gift of spiritual healing. For older people, the pastors and the church are all members of the clergy responsible for spiritual oversight of their herds. The doctrines they teach really consequences.Spiritual Negligence: Canon Mark Pearson, author of Healing Christian, put this way? To keep the ministry of healing from God? And why people do not pass to the interests of the directors of the Church is a congregation both spiritually and neglect would be medical negligence of a hospital refusing to treat heart attacks, because the only choice for the treatment of pneumonia. ? Spiritual is a gross negligence charge, why teach will be judged more strictly (James 3:1). More importantly, think of millions of people that can be passed to an early death, because everyone believed that God is no longer heals.The Church today is but a shadow of a godly influence is once enjoyed, especially because the male in spirit whispered to the ear of him that God is beyond the healing business. E 'a lie from the father of lies.Creating confusion: Many of the leaders of the Church of today must teach that healing is instantaneous, which is immediately to be called a miracle. But God? S word is not confined to spiritual healing instantly. The word? Miracle? simply by a supeatural or divine intervention. Everything is divine and the miraculous healing of nature (Exodus 15:26). He maintained that spiritual healing should be a second miracle that has led many Christians to abandon their faith in God to heal completely. That the reason is almost instantaneously healed of a chronic disease, then, whatever the treatment must take place through physical processes, beyond the direct intervention of God. " You see the fallacy? Without the direct intervention of God can not be the cure? God? S Santa Word tells us that God is Yehovah-Rapha, God, our healer. But only for a moment, think that God has tued his back on healing sick.You sick with the disease. Doctors say there's nothing more you can do. Should not survive. That bleak picture! Not because the doctors can say? Help, but because God is outside the picture.Friend, this is what happens many times a day in churches throughout the land: Churches tu to the sick in the body of Christ to the world. God did not abandon their children as a healer, churches have forsaken our God as a healer! When the teachers of the law wanted to know why the power or the name of an apostle, Peter, spiritual healing given to a lame man, Peter answered? And 'the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified but whom God raised from the dead man before I am healed ... Salvation is found in no other, because it is not under heaven other name given among men by which we must be saved. - Acts 4:10-12 (NIV) Note that Peter has not made any distinction between men? S healing and salvation, which are in death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ (the Gospel). Although the men directed by Peter does not want to believe, however, understood that his statement. Why? No? Peter said that this man was healed, and not because he (Peter) is an apostle, one of a select group of men, but from the healing power of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.What a statement! This is the crux of the cross, the absolute beginning and end of all healing, whether physical or spiritual. Nothing has happened to change this reality, since these words of Peter spoke about 2000 years ago. As God is free from oppression of all people, so is God? S intention of spiritual healing through Jesus Christ our Lord.Jim Lynn is the publisher of the Word of God for healing, a free newsletter, and author of the book, "The miracle of healing in the Church today." Visit: