Changing Shape of Christian spiritual leadership in a society of amoral

Changing Shape of Christian spiritual leadership in a society of amoral Introduction? The moral elements are among the most important of the war. What is the spirit that permeates war as a whole, and at an early stage to establish a close affinity with the will that moves and leads the whole mass of power, almost with the merger, and that the will is in itself a moral. Unfortunately, not yield to academic wisdom. Can not be classified or counted. They must be seen or heard.   - Carl von Clausewitz   Warth The value system of American society has become more relaxed in respect of the rights and freedoms of citizens for the creation and life for one's values. ? The moral? has become a dirty word in many circles of society, as the criteria for the determination of good and evil. Spiritual leaders often avoid saying that the debate is not about efficiency. We certainly wish only to be effective and accountable to describe and justify the traits that lead to effective leadership. But if that is our goal for everyone, so we have removed the moral component of this description and should not pretend that the result is ethical traits. ? The end does not always justify the means. It is not enough for us to determine our success that is the core morality. This is due in large measure our behavior determines the type of people we become. As criminals and dishonest people are not living the life, it would be irrational to act so as to become a person. Leaders call for integrity, discipline, responsibility, commitment, innovation and intelligence to inspire and guide others to achieve the objectives. Although this is not intended as an exhaustive list, nor a complete list of the values of leadership, illustrating how to obtain and justify virtues.Leadership against the administration? Leadership is a function, not a position. (Lewis, 1996) There is a dispute about the difference between leadership and management. It 'possible that a person can be a leader without being an administrator (for example, an informal leader), and a person can be a manager without direct, manage or persons (for example, a manager of financial accounts). Nobody has proposed that the management and direction are equivalent, but the degree of overlap has been a strong point of disagreement. The essence of this argument seems to be that managers are oriented towards stability and leaders are oriented towards innovation, the managers of people to do things more efficiently, while the leader of the people to agree what things should done.The leadership in research today is full of books that describe the virtues of leadership. Recent authors include Stephen Covey, in principle Centered Leadership (1991), John Kötter, What leaders really El (1999), Phillip Lewis, Leadership (1996) and Aubrey Malphurs, Being a leader (2003) and John Maxwell, Leader Development Breast is (1993), to name a few. The argument with the biggest credit goes to John Kötter (1988), who? Leadership and management processes are different? and that people label as well as leaders and / or administrators do little to advance our knowledge and understanding of leadership. The word? manager? is a professional level for many people and is insensitive to use the term in a way that promotes an inaccurate, negative stereotypes of them. (Yükle, 1998) managers and directors are not different people, but the same people in different situations or processes. After reading Kötter, Yükle, Covey, Lewis, Malphurs, Maxwell, and biographies of military leaders of all time, the conclusion seems clear. Although the models that analyze the leadership can change the principles, these principles are timeless, including the moral dimensions. ? leaders who know God and who knows how to drive in a Christian is phenomenal more effectively in the world that even the most skilled and qualified executives to lead without God spiritual guide is not just for pastors and missionaries. (Blackaby, 2001), issue: moral, immoral, or amoral? The moral law causes people to be in complete accord with their ruler, so that, irrespective of their lives, undismayed by any danger. - Dom TzuThe art of war? Morality is a complex system based on principles of cultural, religious and philosophical concepts and beliefs, from which an individual determines whether his actions are right or wrong. (Wikipedia, 2005) For many people, the morale is influenced to a large extent, religion or theology, but for others, secular and ethical codes are followed. Religions claim that morality is not usually a man of building, but is the work of God in the Judeo-Christian Ten Commandments detainees have been released directly by God for humanity. Religious can not justify morality on the basis that help humanity itself is essentially "good" and the moral basis of humanitarian principles. "immoral" refers to? A person or a behavior that is self-conscious in the field of morality, but not to respect the rules. (Wikipedia, 2005) The thief steals agreed that it is wrong but incoherent attempt to justify his act, and shoulders the blame by saying that the other had no choice and so on. In everyday conversation, "amoral" and "immoral" are sometimes used interchangeably. However, "amoral", which is distinguished from "immoral" than this? Amoral or persons not in possession of the concepts of ethics at all because of an unusual or education innate characteristics (such as the so-called antisocial personality disorder) or does not subscribe to any moral code. (Wikipedia, 2005) argue that anyone is going to do what you like and let others do the same, if they wish, without tuing it into a general principle. Because it says that it is just personal preference on how they act, the position is consistent.Many organizations focus more on ethics and moral. Ethics is an intellectual approach to moral questions it raises questions such as how to behave in a specific situation (for example, abortion is morally permissible?) And weather or not the application requires an attitude is an ethical issue debate. As mentioned earlier, the contemporary American society encourages members of the diversity of its people to establish their own values, which leads to cultural relativism. ? Cultural relativism is the principle that an individual's beliefs and business sense in terms of their own culture. (Wikipedia, 2005) The following is a particular aspect of morality may be questioned or justified, and in particular the younger generations in society. Sometimes, the issue extends to society in general, even to the extent of liberalization of laws that prohibit certain behaviors. As with abortion, what? And his body or, in cases of marriage between persons of the same sex, not my business who marries whom. Cultural relativism also leads to a culture? S immoral justification of beliefs. As in the case of racial slurs;? No? S good to use other words to derragatory black blacks in informal conversations or music videos, but? S bad for a person of another race to the military so.US system? If the theory of war has done more than remind us of these [moral] components, which demonstrates the need to give full value and moral qualities, is to broaden their horizons, and only through the creation of this point of view in order advance all those who have tried to base the analysis on material factors alone. - Carl von ClausewitzOn Warth U.S. military has a responsibility to themselves and society to establish and meet high moral standards. This requires the kind of moral value, which is essential for successful leadership. Moreover, a good model for a system of values that the company may be in danger because of his abandonment of traditional values. The military system is based almost entirely on laws that gove it, the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Uniform Code of Military Justice applies to all branches of the armed forces and Coast Guard. Most of the topics covered in the uniform military code of justice that are the cases of military tribunals, the different types of court martial, the treatment and detention of prisoners and the prosecution. Moreover, the rules and regulations goveing the conduct and rules of military conduct. And 'the nature of military leadership to promote virtuous behavior for themselves and those that follow, rather than passively follow the people who are opening their contemporary social values to accommodate trends.The professional military is stuck in the middle of this conflict between tradition and contemporary values, on the one hand, membership of a dynamic society and also called to bring in a strong traditional moral principles. But you may have noticed that people with military experience have certain intangible qualities. Things like free? Confidence, pride and a sense of purpose. The military instills these qualities in recruits, and that makes people good. It embodies the fundamental values such as honor, courage and commitment, the men and women to build character and confidence, develop strong team skills, and lea to accept responsibility and personal responsibility for actions. In the Navy, for example, the same basic principles and values of honor, courage, commitment, and this led to the naval service was launched at the American military perspective Revolution.Military right HomosexualityThe expressed in courts-martial manual (MCM ) and the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) is evident in the U.S. military? s view of homosexual behavior. UCMJ Article 125 of sodomy, said:? Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural caal coupling with another person of the same sex or an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the crime. MCM offers a detailed description of what is considered? Unnatural coupling? that addresses the sex acts of homosexuality. Establishes the maximum penalty for the perpetrators of this crime as a dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for up to 5 years of life (depending on whether the act was consensual and if the act is committed with a child). This is just one of many long-standing military law on the basis of moral acts. Many argue that the Department of Defense (DOD) policy on homosexuals in the military called? No? Do not ask, do not? Say? has weakened the armed forces? s position on this quote issue.By homosexual behavior as an illegal act, the military judge makes a strong law inadmissible. In addition, describes this as a problem? Unnatural? act, MCM Uniform Code of Military Justice and make a determination that the morality of homosexuality itself is wrong. In fact, not provided for in Article 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice or the performance of MCM for the need to demonstrate a negative effect of this activity in order, discipline, or the image of the armed forces. Conduct of the law alone is sufficient to establish guilt. There is a historical basis for the moral condemnation of homosexuality in American society, which leads to the conclusion that this court is based on moral principles, as found in the Bible? They are not with a man as one lies with a woman. (Leviticus 18:22, KJV) system value to American society? America today is a virtue deficit that our standard of right and wrong are increasingly blurred. This veil serious problems within our society, including hostility toward organized religion, sexual exploitation, homosexual agenda, the demise of the family and the culture of death.   - Gary Bauer   President, the American military Values.orgSimilar value system, most of American society of what is considered good and evil (ie, moral), is defined by our legislation. Centuries ago, our founders boldly proclaimed to the world a clear belief in the democracy of America, a faith rooted in the obvious truth that "all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator," This statement shows only Jewish-roots Christian. Public agenda? is an organization that was founded to help our nation? s leaders better understand the public? s point of view and to help citizens understand critical policy issues. In 2002, Public Agenda conducted a detailed study of parents with more than 1,600 American children aged between 5 and 17. The study focused on a pre-eminent challenge of parenting: how to raise children who grow up to be responsible, honest, human, and in view of adults. This study examines in detail the problems of today? s families and the task of bringing up children of good character. From all directions, today? s popular culture seems determined to emphasize the violent, irresponsible, and aspects of life miserable. Almost half of parents (49%) say they worry more about parenting a child who is well behaved and has good values, which aims to provide to your child? s health and welfare (23%), although one quarter (25%) of parents say they worry a lot. (Johnson, 2002) The statistics are a testament to the impact of the moral decadence of a society that has abandoned its traditional HomosexualityThe social value system.American perspective on American society? Homosexuality s position has changed dramatically. The laws against sodomy in this country date back to the American colonies, which enacted strict prohibitions against homosexual acts, on the basis of the strong influence of the Christian settlers. In recent years, gays and lesbians have asked that people accept their sexual orientation as an "alteative lifestyle. In 2003, a landmark verdict in the United States Supreme Court overtued all remaining sodomy laws in the United States against Texas in Lawrence. The court said, "The law marks a class of persons as criminal solely based on the principle of moral disapproval of that class and the behavior associated with the class that is contrary to the values of the Constitution and the equal protection clause in any level of review. " Homosexuals also required to provide benefits to "partners" and to accept gay marriages. Corporate structures are in the front line for submission of requests for homosexual men and women. ? About 45% of Fortune 500 companies offer national and nine of the top ten companies include sexual orientation in their policies of non-discrimination. (Wikipedia, 2005) The gay rights movement has led to changes in social acceptance and the media on behalf of the gay community. The representation of homosexuality in the media guide and reflects societal attitudes towards homosexuality. Important to include an image of homosexuality that homosexuality television appeal Queer Eye for the Straight Guy, Queer as Folk and Will and Grace. Homosexuality is only one aspect of America, where the values of society have changed as a result of an amoral attitude in spiritual values.Conclusion? He who walks with justice and speaks what is right, who rejects gain from extortion and keeps his hand from accepting bribes, who stops ears against plots of murder and closes his eyes against contemplating evil? this is the man who dwells on the heights, which will be the mountain fortress. His bread will be delivered water and do not leave?. (Isaiah 33:15-16, KJV) Although this study has highlighted the lack of popularity in contemporary society to cope with moral, also cited sources who say that the moral dimension is crucial. Moral force is essential for successful leadership, and for the health of a nation. It is essential that today? The Christian leaders are ready to deal with the clash of value systems described in this document. U.S. military and American society is just one example of the lack of moral standards, and appears to be increasing. As members of society and asked to bring a younger generation, it is likely that the leaders have the opportunity to demonstrate the importance of moral leadership. I think that Christian leaders have an obligation to challenge this moral dilemma. With particular attention to its moral foundation, the moral leaders must strengthen the system of moral values that made this country strong.GlossaryAmorality. The quality that they had no idea of right or wrong. (ie, morally neutral.) cultural relativism. The principle that an individual's beliefs and business sense in terms of their culture.Ethics. A general term for what is often described as "the science (study) of morality." In philosophy, ethical behavior is what is "good" or "right." The Weste tradition of ethics is sometimes called moral philosophy.KJV. King James Version (from The Holy Bible). Military Law. The statutes goveing the military and the regulations issued to carry them out. In a limited sense, the term has been identified with the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM). Morale. System based on principles of cultural, religious and philosophical concepts and beliefs, from which an individual determines whether his actions are correct or wrong.Moral relativism. The position that moral propositions do not reflect absolute or universal truth. Not only is this view that emerges from social ethics and personal preferences, but there is no single standard for evaluating the proposal for an ethics truth.Sociology. The study of the social life of individuals, groups and societies, sometimes defined as the study of social interactions.Sociological. A view that focuses not on individuals but their group or society. In this perspective, human social structures, including govemental and cultural institutions and behavior can be explained by social facts or social forces.Values. A set of beliefs and ideas on general concepts.Value system. The order of priorities and ethical and ideological values that an individual or company holds.Virtue. The usually well-known, the agreement or arrangement of the powers of man to the direction of some or act. Virtue is moral excellence of a man or a woman. The four classic Weste "cardinal" virtues are: prudence / wisdom, justice, fortitude / courage, temperance.Bibliography10 USC Chapter 47 (2001). Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) American Psychological Association (2001) Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 5th edition. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCBauer, G. (2005) Declaration on Religion and Culture. America Values.org retrieved electronically May 10 2005, by H. and Blackuby, R. (2001) spiritual guide: the displacement of people in God? S Program. Broadman and Holman Publishers. Nashville, Tennesee.Griffith, S. B. (2003). Sun Tzu. The Art of War, translated by Samuel B. Griffith. Running Press Book Publishers; Miniature edition.Howard, M. (1984) Carl von Clausewitz. On the war, translated by Michael Howard. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ.Johnson, J. (2002). What parents say television today. A report by the Public Agenda of the Family Friendly Programming Forum.Kotter, J. (1988). The factor of leadership. Reed Business Information Inc. Waltham, Massachucets.Lawrence et. al. c. Texas (26 June 2003) curriculum, the majority opinion, agreed, and dissidents. The entire 52-page document written compilation. PV (1996) Leadership: A new model of Church involvement total. Broadman and olman Publishers. Nashville, Tennessee.Malphurs, A. (2003). Being a leader. The nature of authentic Christian leadership. Baker Books. Grand Rapids, for Michigan.Manual war (2002). Includes the amendments of April 11 to 2002.Wikipedia (2005). Homosexuality. Retrieved from Wikipedia electronically (web-based, the free encyclopedia) on 09 May 2005, in G. (1998). Leadership in Organizations, 4th edition. Prentice-HallLieutenant Kenneth Rice is an Active Duty Naval Officer stationed in Norfolk, VA. Lieutenant Rice is a graduate of Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, where he received a Master of Science in Education Educational Leadership and Management subspecialty training. He is currently writing the Naval War College to complete the Joint Professional Military Training Phase I and the Regent University working towards a PhD in strategic leadership.