Questions Your Pastor Will Hate The Book Part One

Questions Your Pastor Will Hate The Book Part One When I was a child I wanted to ask my minister questions about things which, to my young mind, it makes no sense when I read the Bible or more likely heard in Sunday school. Children are some simple questions about stories of the Bible. Children are not yet programmed to think that just because it's in the Bible or that God has said and he should know whereof he speaks, the story is true or even possible in light of the years 2000 and greater progress in human thought and knowledge. His answers were always rather bland and not a po 'of difference, because, after all, he is the pastor and I am only a child. I never met a minister, in my youth, it does not. They accepted the Bible to their value and I believe that children, started early in life because of their pastors, at a time when it becomes a pastor has always been regarded as a high vocation. For better or for worse, today is not so much due to the fact that the waings on the States to avoid? Vanity, jealousy, lust and greed? are all part of man as a pastor with these types. The man is human. We have to get used to concept.Pastors now suffer from credibility problems and because of the availability of information from a person who has been unprecedented in ancient times. The Inteet can easily provide many other parts of a problem or cause biblical questions more than ever dreamed that? I never thought about this? is amended by adding new information. If I had inteet in search of answers to my questions, I seriously doubt I would have gone to spend 26 years in the ministry for me. Inteet is available for the mass that the books were in the past. There was a time when the books are too expensive for the average Christian and the minister or priest of the word, because it is common practice. When access to the books arrived, including the Bible that even a layman can read and gain a bigger picture not just what he said about the Church, a new threat to the Church was him. No more? Few speak for it? o? Well, God does not see that man and God's ways are not the way this man? work. These phrases are still used today by the Minister as the answer to questions that are uncomfortable, but are less effective than in periods when there was a shot behind the threat to reverse the Church or questions that you have to do with you. Today, if you do not like the answers in a church, you can simply switch to another. In the past, there was no other, the Church is to participate, or you have been labeled a? Heretic? and subject to all hunting, the establishment by the? True? Church. Today, churches can not shout from the rooftops that are the true Church, the real honest answer to all questions about who and what God is and what he does, that the true church of others on the street or on the Inteet solution. for the Church, which is likely to cause problems in itself is simple. The banning of books or bu them. Sometimes they have for both people. Disfellowshipped, marked and declared anathama is a way to control who strayed from the Church, and if it did not work, buing like a book always seemed to be the case of a awhile.I many ways, but very few answers. Over the years, I have concluded that most of the real answers to my questions were really sincere, is not clearly addressed by the Minister or the Church. I do what I leaed later, would one? Apologetics. Funny word! As a child, you played for me how the Church was to apologize for his position somewhat, 'but the way it was. I believe that literally? Apologetics? were artistic medium of a church to go to deny the reality of good science or good theology that contradicted his position. Un po 'come? Ok, we know that there are close to the truth of the matter, and we're sorry, but it's the way we look. Hmm, maybe not yet so far away from that feeling. Genuine apologetics are somewhat 'more technical and more acceptable in areas such as theology, but hey, I was a child. I knew when I had to apologize for something I knew I must be evil, it seems that maybe have a bad word for the practice to defend the true doctrine of the true Church. In fact, I still feel that even today, but the art of apologizing for refusing to bend on issues where new information sheds light on the oldest biblical perspective still seems to be the way responds to the questions. You know how? This is a good question, Dennis, and we are sorry that you are no longer welcome here. This is a characteristic of many apologetic question fundamentists when pressed to provide answers to questions that the Bible or can not or do not admit that it does not seem the same answer given by the name of the 1800s in recent years. You know? Dennis, we'll be happy to help. How did you come? Most biblical scholars trained to recognize, for example, that the book of Daniel was written during the Babylonian captivity by a letter from Daniel in the 6th century BC. I grew up believing that to be surprised and, as a shepherd, the precise and detailed prophecy book proportions to expose, not stories of dreams, lion dens spooking and writing on the wall. E? Forecasts? the rise and fall of all great nations, in order, and Chapter 11 is simply a very detailed prophecy that few people could understand. In fact, the only people I have met? Show? Looney tune who believe Ministers have also given their own church or ministry in writing between the lines. Daniel seems to be accurate, because it is the prophecy of the reform of history and history of non prophecied. I realized that the accuracy of the book is due to Hinds, no foresight and could not really see the future, and that would be beyond the 160 of British Columbia, when in fact written is very vague and general in its forecasts . One thing is man, not a God thing.This book is about guestions most pastors and priests of hatred that arise around May and falling in response. I say most, because I met a number of very open and very honest biblical scholar and the lay ministers on the road. In a letter, I want to say that I disappeared behind the text and the Bible are not just readers, who, too often, education is the only one they have. Bible readers cry out in strong sermons and trial of those who see things from their way.Theologically educated men and women tend to keep their opinions to themselves if they want to keep their jobs or at best cases, are not these sermons on subjects they know the assembly is no longer the threat of a developer. They know that knowledge is the threat of the media who still believe that simply? God has said. I think. What does it mean for me. I remember Glitching during a sermon to about 8,000 people to explain how Matthew seems more inclined to explain his need of Jesus'. If I tried to prove my point of view of Jesus in a document in the same way that Matthew is trying to prove his point in the Gospels, I have very low levels. I slipped on the theme of "Virgin Birth? and said? Come on people, where children come to do? You see, ask them simple questions again! Have you ever heard of all 8000 people inhale at the same time? This little voice in my head, had a chat with me and told me? Nice to go Dennis. I think that will soon hear about it. We did it. A few months later, the powers that have been delcared I knew a lot of Jesus, but Jesus did not know. Well .... that was left my shepherd living in a brief interview. I did not know was that one or the other and know a lot of Jesus does not play well, of course, denominational headquarters. Damn I guess.So issues we have fun. These issues are not lucubrations long. They are the kind of simple questions of a child or young person sincerely ask any pastor, priest or minister, if inclined to sentence. E 'un po' as the Lions and Lambs directed by small children who seem to impair the ability to ask the obvious before the Church apologetics book on common sense for them. Let us focus on issues begin.These the Gospels of Mark, Matthew, Luke and John and to assume that order. I would like to ask questions using the three synoptics, or like the Gospels of Mark, Matthew and Luke, as well as other John in its entirety. We ask our questions as a curious teenager or lay member in which to spend a week at the hearing? Old Old Story? said the pastor or the minister as he knocks back and forth between these four books on a regular basis, as if they were coherent and harmonious accounts of the literal interpretation of the events of Jesus' life, death and resurrection. We will ask questions that are normally curious that every church that is a State could believe what they said, almost without doubt, but there are still questions. Ask questions, because we want to know something or may be the case. We wonder why we say that this took place in May, but in another place, he said he did not, or does not say where he said that it happened differently. We ask why there are apparent contradictions in the texts that can not be both right and we do not feel bad for what we see, or be disuaded from answers that include? The man does not see that God sees. In fact, it could be good for some answers to our questions that we are not really interested or will be useful to get to the bottom of what we believe to be a real problem that deserves a real answer.But first. .. Anwer unacceptable for our real Questions.Proverbs 14: 12? There is a way that looks like a man, but its end is the way of death? Translation:? Well, what seems to be a good question for you is simply to big problems. o? So you think that your question has Merrit, but it provides a slippery slope heading. Jeremiah 17: 9 The heart is misleading, above all things and desperately wicked: who can know? Translation: Are you kidding, you evil bastard, if you think you are sincere EVN asking that question. Humans are so evil, their questions are always suspected, is yours, even if it comes. Anything that you try to do in any case the church? Isaiah 55:8-9? For my thoughts are not your thoughts, your ways are not my ways, saith the Lord. To the sky above the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts higher than your thoughts. Translation: you can not ask a question that God also be interested, or, by extension, us. We believe that better and more clearly than you do, if you think like us, would certainly not think of asking for such question.Proverbs 28:26? Who trusts in his own heart ... is a jester? Translation: Are you sure that you ask a sincere question, when in reality you are a fool. You can not ask questions from your heart or your head, because they are not reliable in nature. Thus, in reality, we will never ask questions, that is exactly what we think you should stop doing, is fool.I Corinthians3 :19-20? For the wisdom of this world is foolishness to God. " So it is written: "It 'catches the wise in their cunning and again," The Lord knows the thoughts of the wise, that are unnecessary ...? Translation: No matter how clever or smart you think you are, God is laughing at your question. God knows, we, like the Church, that its application is suspect if you do not need more time to lose, even for the confidence that you ask a good attitude.Corinthians 2:14-15? Natural ... man receives the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, nor can we know they are spiritually disceing ...? Translation: You're not spiritual enough to ask a good question. And what seems to be a good question foolishiness to God, and on the road. Any spiritual response, it was lost because it is natural for your man that we still face with.Proverbs 18:2? A fool has no delight in understanding, but to express its heart. Translation: You are an idiot and do not really want the answer. You are all caught in their own thinking, understanding and discussion and the sincerity of so.I Corinthians 1:20-21? Where is the wise? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? God does not make sense for the wisdom of the world ...? Translation: you're not smart enough to not write well enough, nor good enough reason to ask a question. And if you do, your wisdom and world views are always foolish to God, and we ... us.I especially how to get the point that there are many quotes that sends the message loud and clear that humans are not able to ask questions sincerely because deceitfuness, the spirit of sincerity, or human reason. I Corinthians 1, it is very clear that? God? uses what seems absurd to confuse those who seem wise. This is pure apologetics. This is a song written and used by the Church to those who have questioned everything that I do not understand. When all else fails, the only question that I use them? Human reason. Never mind that human reason is all that human beings have. Anyone who implies that their reasoning is closer to God is a joke, you and them big time! All human beings with reason, human reason. So we have three gods in a child bo without sin, and the Holy Spirit and somehow women without sin. This is how we get the dinosaurs on the ark or not, and without consequences, when a man puts his hands to stop the sun and the moon so that the Israelites were a little 'more time for the fight against the slaughter and in the light of day, everyone in sight. Human reason is what has brought us the Crusades, the Inquisition and the Holocaust. Human reason is what apologists for the hard questions, without giving any reason. It's what keeps the church locked in the dark ages and ministers to be honest about what, in their courage, know that they are more enlightened than you have leaed. That's all human reason, when it comes to it.A some answers that are also unacceptable. E 'a mystery. We can not know. ? You are not the son of Dave Dimwitt? ? Now, what is a young man or woman is asked how big a problem? ? You just lea to play more and allow the Bible to me. ? Son, how old are you? ? Listen here, I was a pastor for 20 years. ? Listen, I am a pastor of 40 years. ? It is wrong to think I taught? ? You have that right from the Inteet? ? Oh, if you think you are old enough to know the truth from falsehood? ? Satan is the son after you. ? Satan girl. ? Well, you know that you are not the first to arrive at this question. ? You think you know more than the Church? ? You think you know better than Jesus? ? So you think you know better than God? ? Oh, if you think you know better than Apostle (fill in the blank). ? You are not around these parts, it was young? ? You are a good kind of ass are not you? The responses imply that beyond reason that they want a simple explanation of a simple question is not acceptable at any time. What we discovered is that the pastor or priest feels rushed or pushed into a coer, which will be more defensive, depending on their education. Ministers Bible readers back to more easily make fun of the issue or in order to charge the questioner. In some rare cases, we are able to respond to a very enlightened Patora or a priest who can say, without deception? Now son, this is a good question and one that I have problems with my department. Let's see if we can find a good answer. This reaction is very rare and may be sincere, but do not be fooled, it's also one that can be used insincerely, giving the impression of an open mind, you have leaed? If you can not beat 'em, join them, to ea more. Sorry to say, this is not really a trick, the sincerity and the technology used to launch the issue of custody. It is hoped, however. The key is to feel the matter has been settled on the word good. Kidding Ourselves.As a pastor, I need the Bible is inerrant and true in every sense, even in detail. After all, if God, that for sure, he wrote, said or done mistakes contradictory stories, that is with whom? If I could find a single error, inaccuracy, exaggeration, error or contradiction, is not perfect unless the inspired word of God? Sure, some might say? No, of course, is not it? others say. Often, those who believe that there is no real reason to question the Bible calls a question? Alleged contradictions? o? texts that seem contradictory. While acknowledging the difficulty of the Gospel to be present, he is often dismissed as generally overestimated. We must realize that when you have to believe one thing is true in every sense, all the problems are overstated and exaggerated. Typical of this apologetic comments such as this: "We are often surprised to find how many apparent contradictions [in the Gospel Resurrection accounts] are not contradictory at all, but only differences. .. first order ... But the fact remains that all [of the resurrection accounts], without exception, can be dropped in one place in the narrative coherent and orderly, without the smallest contradiction or difficulty and without suppression, invention, or move beyond a futile effort to imagine the natural behavior of a group of people caught running on the dawn, the light that enters Jerusalem and garden. "Dorothy Sayers, the man bo to be king, p. 19f.So here we see that the contradictions are seen? Often? not yet? apparent? e? simply complementary. In other words, often regarded as the contradictions are obvious to make the story more accurately. The differences appear to be? Grand? but not yet? low. This is the best apologetic or worse depending. And 'the ability to really say? The snake? after it was struck by her. The denial is more than just a river in Egypt. You often hear the differences in the Gospel accounts are very much the same way that four different people have an accident. All accounts are complementary and not contradictory. They see things from different angles and coers of streets, or for display on a machine more than others, but it is still an accident. But often, in fact, is more like the display of an accident and have the following conversation. Wow, yellow bug really whacked by this truck. Truck. What does it mean? E 'was the virus that hit the BMW. Excuse me! E 'was the bus that hit the BMW. What King? Umm, people! The plan came out of nowhere and click on the bug and the jeep. Pete for fun. What is Jeep and air? If there were no more. There was an accident?   END PART