Oberster Gerichtshof entscheidet zugunsten der Arzt die zum Beihilfe Suizid

Oberster Gerichtshof entscheidet zugunsten der Arzt die zum Beihilfe Suizid The Supreme Court ruled in January against the U.S. govement? S attempt to end Oregon? An S-of-a-child-physician assisted suicide law, a decision that people of faith, to celebrate one, or a uproar.Additionally, while the ruling of the Supreme Court has articulated in a technical position in relation to the distribution of medicines, some people of faith are conceed that states adopt similar laws around the country.The Supreme Court on the Oregon Death with Dignity Act, which was in 1997 and is very specific. The law is very ill? terminally ill, that at least two doctors agree have six months of life? , The healthy mind. It allows terminally ill patients a lethal prescription from their doctors manage themselves.In a 6-3 majority the Supreme Court rejected Gonzales v. Oregon. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote that the U.S. govement? S attempt to curb physician-assisted suicide with the controlled substances law? Bar, doctors to issue rules? legitimate medical purpose? ? what? unusually large and the authorities. Writing for the majority, Kennedy writes? The statute manifests no intention to regulate the practice of medicine in general. In the opinion, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote on behalf of himself and Judges John Roberts and Clarence Thomas. He wrote:? When the term? Legitimate medical purpose? has any meaning, it is certainly not the prescription of drugs to death. He quoted Webster's Dictionary, if the function of medicine as a? Science and art dealing with the prevention, cure, or alleviation of disease. The case began in 2004 when the then Minister of Justice John Ashcroft directive Oregon doctors who assist their patients in suicide under the Oregon Death with Dignity Act against the federal Controlled Substances Act. This was the same day his resignation was announced.This opinion, even if strictly targeted, has some people of faith, which has a greater impact in question. Physician assisted suicide is corruption of the medical profession? Edward Ferton said, staff ethicist at the National Catholic Bioethics. The goal of medicine is to cure or heal, not kill. Ferton said doctor-assisted suicide? Immoral? and that is? The destruction of the gift of life? a gift from God. " However, supporters of the Oregon Death with Dignity Act says that honors human dignity instead of compromise. This decision is said to have the right to choose with dignity and humanity? said George Eighmey, executive director of Compassion and the selection of Oregon. ? I can get out of [life] on my own terms and nobody else? S? and I do not? t have to tu away from someone else? s beliefs.Those of the Jewish faith believe that this is a personal matter, which means that members of faith can choose their position on physician-assisted suicide. Not Judaism? t have a price on everything. The only constant is that it presumes to be the truth in the wisdom of this? said Rabbi Ariel Stone of Shir Tikvah Synagogue in Oregon. ? Let reverence for life and humility in the face of life. I think that leads to understanding that we do not prolong life, which in itself is an act of arrogance. There was never any sense to me that faith would die at? Stein added. ? God has given us in this world, because you should? T God for us. Not? T to the contrary. I want the same loving hands around me who helped me, and see God in these acts. The issue remains highly controversial in the medical profession. This act of a new sense of control for patients? Nancy said Dr. Crumpacker, a retired doctor from Oregon. ? This is all about patients. It is not power that is a doctor. But Dr. Kenneth Stevens Foundation of compassionate medical care in violation of the law, told the Associated Press that worries the pressure may be terminally ill to end their lives. He noted the American Medical Association is also against the death with dignity Act.A total of 208 people? Most cancer patients? have taken the lethal prescription from 1998 to 2004, according to the Associated Press.Eighmey said that the honor, with many people, if they have the prescription, and that many of these were solemn, sometimes with religious ceremonies. This is a family business case? Eighmey said. ? Want to have the right to say goodbye. And 'love and care, humanity and dignity. Heather J. Ciras book editor at Science and Theology News.